Manufacturing and Analytical Characterization - Chemical
Jonathan Stratton
SciY
Sam Henson, PhD
synTQ Business Development Manager, Americas
SciY
Mars, Pennsylvania, United States
Jonique Samuels, BS
Innovations Manager
SciY
Yate, England, United Kingdom
Paul Gillham, BS
Director Innovations, SciY
SciY
Yate, England, United Kingdom
Carl A. Anderson, Ph.D.
Associate Dean
Duquesne University
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Md. Nahid Hasan, MS
Student
Duquesne University
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
θk, iNAS=cos-1((∑NASk,imix*NASkideal) / (‖NASk,imix‖ ‖NASkideal‖)) Equation 4
Results: The first comparison of prediction performance was between the in-line pure components and the off-line pure components. The off-line pure components had an RMSEP of 2.83 % compared to 11.55 % for the in-line pure components. The in-line and off-line pure components were combined to form spectral sets which were used to predict the mixture samples. The RMSEP showed a consistent trend, increasing as more in-line pure components were included. The NAS-T diagnostic showed no difference between the in-line and off-line pure components, but the SSR was clearly affected by the pure component collection conditions. When the results were labeled by MCC collection condition, it became clear that the MCC captured nonchemical variance which helped to match the overall spectral shape but distorted the prediction performance. Figure 1A shows the trend in RMSEP, and figure 1B shows the SSR trend with MCC collection conditions. Next, the prediction performance and diagnostics were compared for the off-line and minimal pure components. The RMSEP values were 2.70 and 2.17 for the off-line and minimal pure components, respectively, confirming the potential for drastic material cost reductions via IOT. This prompted the investigation to further reduce the amount of API required for model calibration, commonly cited as a limitation to PAT in early phase development. Spectra collected with minimal API showed accurate predictions with as little as 250 mg of API while maintaining a consistent NAS-T value, confirming reliable predictions. Figure 2 shows the minimized API results.
Conclusion: The API potency was predicted in a mini-batch blender with IOT using multiple sets of pure component spectra. The off-line spectra reduced the material consumption by 87%, and the minimal pure components provided a 99% reduction compared to in-line measurement. The prediction accuracy was comparable for off-line, minimal, and spectra using 250 mg API while maintaining an appropriate NAS-T value, providing confidence in predictions. This study demonstrates the ability of IOT, in conjunction with pure component collection conditions, to drastically reduce the material expenditure in chemometric modeling and potentiates the expansion of this PAT strategy to earlier phases of development.
References: 1. Rish, A. J., Henson, S., Drennen, J. K., & Anderson, C. A. (2024). Defining the range of calibration burden: from full calibration to calibration-free. Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation, 19(3), 39.
Acknowledgements: The authors would like to acknowledge LCI for their support of this work.
A-RMSEP trend across spectral sets, showing a gradual increase in prediction error as in-line pure components were added to the IOT input. B-SSR trend labeled by MCC collection condition, showing the effect of the nonchemical variance captured in the in-line environment.
Chart shows the RMSEP when the API spectrum collected with the designated amount of material was used, showing the comparability between the 1000 mg and 250 mg predictions. The chart shows the NAS-T values and confirms the reliability of the predictions.